An Online experiment during the 2020 US–Iran crisis shows that exposure to common enemies can increase political polarization
Jahani, Eaman*, Gallagher, Natalie M*, Merhout, Friedolin*, Cavalli, Nicolo*, Guilbeault, Douglas*, Leng, Yan*, and Bail, Christopher A*
Scientific Reports Jul 2022
Longstanding theory indicates a common enemy can mitigate conflict between
members of rival groups. We tested this hypothesis in a pre-registered experiment
where 1,670 Republicans and Democrats in the United States were asked to complete a
collaborative online task with an automated agent or “bot" that was labelled as a
member of the opposing party. Prior to this task, we exposed respondents to primes
about a) a common enemy (involving threats from Iran, China, and Russia); b) a
patriotic event; or c) a neutral, apolitical prime. Though we observed no
significant differences in the behavior of Democrats as a result of these primes, we
found that Republicans—and particularly those with very strong conservative
views—were significantly less likely to cooperate with Democrats when primed about a
common enemy. We also observed lower rates of cooperation among Republicans who
participated in our study during the 2020 Iran crisis, which occurred in the middle
of our data collection. These findings indicate common enemies may not reduce
inter-group conflict in highly polarized societies, and contribute to a growing
number of studies that find evidence of asymmetric political polarization. We
conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for research in social
psychology, political conflict, and the rapidly expanding field of computational
social science.